CoreCMO

Revenue Impact Calculator


What is the playbook worth to your revenue plan?

Enter your current numbers below. The calculator models the projected 12, 24, and 36-month ARR impact of implementing the playbook, broken out by which modules contribute which improvements. The model uses conservative assumptions anchored on the SOM math from the TAM, SAM & Market Sizing.

Your current numbers

e.g., $25M = 25000000

From your CRM closed-deals data

Includes expansion and churn. 105% = 5% net growth before new logos.

What % of customer count you add each year (gross, before churn)

How fast the playbook delivers its modeled gains

Projected ARR impact

3-year cumulative ARR delta:

$0

vs. without the playbook

Year Without With Delta
Year 1 $0 $0 $0
Year 2 $0 $0 $0
Year 3 $0 $0 $0

PROJECTED LIFTS BY METRIC

Win rate     +0%
Average ACV     +0%
Sales cycle     0 days
Logo retention     +0 pts
Net dollar retention     +0 pts

Model uses conservative composite assumptions from public B2B SaaS benchmarks. Actual results vary with execution quality, market conditions, and starting state. Not a guarantee — a directional model the CFO can audit.

Per-area contribution — where the lifts come from

Each module in the Strategic Foundation contributes a specific kind of lift. Conservative estimates from public B2B SaaS data; your actual lift depends on execution.

the — TAM, SAM & Market Sizing +5–15% addressable pipeline tightening

Removing non-fit accounts from the spend universe. Reallocates budget to higher-conversion segments. Direct effect on win rate and CPL.

the — ICP & Audience +30–50% paid-marketing efficiency

The focus dividend. Locked ICP doubles paid efficiency and tightens sales-cycle math by ~20% in the focused segment.

the — Buyer Personas & Propensity +20–30% SDR conversion lift

Propensity-to-buy scoring routes sales effort to Hot-band accounts. SDR-to-meeting conversion tightens; pipeline coverage holds with lower SDR headcount.

the — Right-to-Win +15–25% win rate lift in named segment

The empirical truth about where you win consistently. Sharpens positioning against named competitors; closed-won rate in the Right-to-Win segment rises by 15–25 points.

the — Competitive Intelligence −20–35% loss-on-competitor

Proactive competitive intel reduces the “found out from a buyer” failure mode. Battlecards close more deals against named competitors.

the — Pricing & Packaging +8–15% ASP lift from tier discipline

Value-based pricing + discount governance + middle-tier bullseye design. The single largest non-volume revenue lever.

the — Win/Loss Analysis Closes the loop on positioning

Compounding effect — the feedback loop that keeps Right-to-Win, Pricing, and Brand honest quarter over quarter.

the — Brand & Positioning −15–25% CAC from inbound lift

Brand-led awareness compounds over 12–24 months. Inbound share rises; paid CAC drops; the AI-Overviews citation game gets winnable.

the — Customer Marketing +3–7 pts NDR lift

Expansion playbooks + referenceable Champions + community programs. The cheapest, highest-conversion demand channel any function operates.

the — AI Operating Model 2–3× team output per FTE

Named agents reporting to named humans. Every per-module lift above gets multiplied by the AI Operating Model’s output velocity. No direct revenue lift; enables every other lift to run at scale.

The math is conservative. The architecture compounds.

The numbers above assume the playbook is implemented as a system, not as scattered fixes. The 90-day journey on Operator Brief is the sequence. The Architecture page shows the agent system that runs it. The Operator Brief is where you start.

How the model works


The math behind the numbers.

The calculator runs a simple compound-growth model. Without the playbook, your ARR projects forward using your current win rate, ACV, retention, and new-logo growth rate. With the playbook, each of those four inputs gets the conservative lift estimated from the sections above. The lifts compound over time, weighted by the implementation-aggressiveness setting (conservative = 12-month ramp, moderate = 6–9-month ramp, aggressive = 3–6-month ramp).

The compounding is real. A 15% lift in win rate plus a 10% lift in ACV plus 3 retention points isn’t additive — it’s multiplicative. That’s why mature marketing functions running a coherent playbook outperform scattered execution by a factor, not a percentage.

What the model doesn’t capture. Macro shifts in the market. Competitor moves that erase your category position. Internal execution failures (the playbook is a system; the system requires the operator). The CFO conversation that determines whether the budget for the playbook actually gets approved. The model is a directional tool, not a forecast.

How to use this with the CFO. Plug in your current numbers, pick the conservative implementation setting, screenshot the 3-year ARR delta, and walk into the budget conversation with the model in hand. The model is auditable — every lift assumption is tied to a specific area. The CFO can dispute the assumptions; that’s the productive conversation. The model gives you the floor to have it.

Strategic · Creative · Data Driven · Revenue Accelerator